Home

Election Reform Network

Top Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • What We Stand For
  • Achievements
  • Contact Us
  • Forum

Constitutional Amendment Proposed on the House Floor


Elections are for citizens - not corporations.  Contact your congressperson  to cosponsor the proposed amendment to regulate corporate political spending.

Are Corporations Going to Dominate Our Elections, too?


Watch the video then click here to sign the Petition for Campaign Finance Reform in Pennsylvania Now!


 


Click on Uncle Sam to get signed up!


 

Election Board Response to ERN Study on Vote Discrepancies: "We're Happy"

Jul 13, 2010

Six weeks ago the Election Reform Network released a study of 2008 general election results in Montgomery County that uncovered widespread disparities between machine counts and voter records at the polls. binary options trading At that time the Election Board indicated concern and vowed to investigate and respond publicly.

Their response last Wednesday might be described as a heaping helping of outright dismissal with a sprinkling of concern and willingness to do better. The attorney speaking for the Department of Voter Services,characterized ERN results, which included disparities in three-quarters of county election districts, as "not for you (the Election Board) to do anything about." He went on to say that

Continue reading

Marching Toward Accountability at the Election Board

Jun 17, 2010

About a month ago the Election Reform Network issued a report detailing disparities between the machine vote counts and voter attendance in the 2008 general election in Montgomery County.  The study found inconsistencies for an alarming three-quarters of the election districts in the county.  Discrepancies of up to 47 voters per election district were uncovered and almost 50 districts had differences of nine or more voters.  Eleven districts had disparities of 20 or more voters.  

Continue reading

Press Highlights Significance of ERN Vote Disparity Study

May 16, 2010

Watchdog group spotlights lost votes in electronic machines
By Jenna Portnoy
May 15,2010
OF THE MORNING CALL

It won't matter how much time you spend comparing the records of U.S. Senate candidates Joe Sestak and Arlen Specter if your vote doesn't count Tuesday.

That's the message election watchdogs in Montgomery County hope to get across in a report binary option released this week.

The Election Reform Network found that the number of Montgomery residents who showed up to vote in the 2008 presidential election rarely exactly matched the tally on the electronic voting machines. No one knows what happened to the missing voters.

Election officials generally blame the discrepancy on human error. But others worry the machines could be to blame.

''All you can do is print ballot images churned out by the same software that recorded the vote,'' said Steve Strahs of Melrose Park, who wrote the report. ''You have what amounts to a black box. You can't audit the system, you can't recount the votes.''

Continue reading

Review of 08 Vote Records in Montgomery County Reveals Discrepancies Between Votes Cast and Voters

May 13, 2010

Network Reports Disparities Between Machine Counts and Voter Sign-ins for Most Election Districts in 08; Calls for a Reconciling of Voter Sign-ins with Machine Counts Before Results Are Official

The Election Reform Network is coming forward today with a report that points to dangerous deficiencies binary trading option in the voting process in Montgomery County. The report uncovers disparities between machine counts and voter attendance for three-quarters of election districts (EDs) in Montgomery County during the 08 general election . 

Continue reading

Time to Move Campaign Finance Reform in the PA House

Mar 20, 2010

If campaign finance reform were easy, it wouldn't make a huge difference in Pennlsylvania's politics.   And, of course, if it were that easy, we'd probably have it already.  So it's no surprise that as things start looking promising for serious reform, there are thickets of obstacles to overcome.  To make sure that this opportunity doesn't slip away, we need your help.
 

Continue reading

Tell The Inquirer: Election Problems Go Deeper Than One Precinct

Feb 25, 2010

A federal law suit seeking redress against the Chester County Election Board for practices that resulted in unconscionably long lines and as much as a day-long wait to vote at a poll near Lincoln University back in the November 08 election has - thankfully - put election administration back in the spotlight for a minor media moment.  The Inquirer recently ran a piece by columnist Mark Bowden on the incident entitled "Indefensible."   Why not tell The Inquirer at inquirer.letters@phillynews.com that the issue is much bigger than one egregious precinct in Chester County?

Continue reading

Starting the U-turn on Corporate Political "Free Speech" Nationally and Moving Ahead with Campaign Finance Reform in Pennsylvania

Feb 10, 2010

Last week seems to have been "take-off" time for the movement for national campaign finance reform in the wake of the Supreme Court's Citizens United  corporate "free speech" decision.  Here's a quick run-down.

Continue reading

A Populist Moment for Campaign Finance Reform in PA

Jan 29, 2010
Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne is onto something.  He asserts that "we have reached a true populist moment in American politics." The U.S. Supreme Court majority sniffed last week that the lure of campaign cash has nothing to do with the likelihood of public corruption or undue influence on our institutions and public officials.  It's just that corporations have the right to free speech (even without a mention of them in the constitution).  And if the result is a torrent of corporate dollars contaminating the political process, which doesn't exactly pass the sniff test as it is, we can all pay homage to the glories of the first amendment.
 
Maybe the Supremes missed the health care reform stalemate in Congress.  Health insurers and HMOs spent nationally more than $126 million in the first half of 2009 alone on campaign contributions and lobbying to fight health care reform. That's a clip of nearly $700,000 per day.

And they undoubtedly glanced over Pennsylvania's recent state budget fiasco.  Last year the interests that blocked adequate revenue from reaching the state's coffers were many, but they all had one thing in common: big bucks "invested" politically.  Want to tax the natural gas extracted from the Marcellus Shale?  You say it's a no-brainer from a policy perspective.  Sorry.  Governor Rendell backed away and the legislature ran for cover – maybe next year.  The gas industry recently showered state senate leaders with more than $200,000 in campaign contributions and the governor was rewarded, too (all before the fact) . 

 
Disgusted? Let's get the ball rolling on campaign finance reform in PA.  Click here to sign a citizens' petition to help get this issue some visibility in our state.
Continue reading

With Sparse Turnout, Problems Persisted at the Polls Last Election Day

Dec 15, 2009

This past election day (Nov. 3, 09) voters avoided the polls in droves, yet there were the usual procedural problems and occasional confusion in an otherwise lackluster voting day.     
 
Only 25 percent of eligible voters turned out in Montgomery County, but that compared favorably with Philadelphia’s abysmal turnout of 12 percent and the statewide figure of 20 percent.  While the 2005 municipal election also generated a countywide turnout in Montco of 25 percent, that election lacked the high court races that were supposed to drive voter participation this time around.

Continue reading

How Did We Judge Them?

Nov 9, 2009

There went the judges.  They were all over the ballot last Tuesday – Pennsylvania Supreme Court (one seat), Superior Court (four seats), Commonwealth Court (two seats), Court of Common Pleas (in Montco, seven races).  Then there are the “retentions” (one for Superior Court and one for Commonwealth Court; the ballot for local judges varies, depending on your county).   Picking judges is a pretty ho-hum affair, but not this year, when two juvenile court justices in Luzerne County put the workings of the judiciary on trial.  Yet voter turnout was still barely visible at 20 percent statewide.  Why?  The problem goes way beyond an apathetic electorate.

Continue reading
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
  • Contents
    • Montco Election Problems
    • Sequoia Machine Blues
    • Emergency Ballots
    • Reports and studies
      • Reports on Election Administration
      • Key Studies on Vote Machines
    • Campaign Finance Reform
    • Court Cases
    • Voter Registration Reform
    • State Legislation
    • Why Do We elect Judges?

Contribute!

We can't do what we do without your help!

Printing, postage, travel to meetings, research, it all costs money. Won't you please help protect your vote by clicking the PayPal logo and making a small donation via our secure PayPal page? You don't need a PayPal account to pay by credit card.

Thanks for your help!

electionreformnetwork.us is owned and operated by
Stephen Strahs of Melrose Park, PA
©2008-2010
This Drupal Powered Website
Is built and managed by
Wyndhound Online Communities
with help from